Cold Email vs. LinkedIn DMs: We Ran Both for the Same Client. Here Are the Numbers

Cold email vs LinkedIn DMs, same client, same message: 335 emails delivered and zero calls versus 139 DMs and 22 calls booked. Every number inside.

Two phones side by side: a cluttered email inbox and a simple one-to-one LinkedIn conversation
Brad Riddell
Post By
Brad Riddell

"Should we do cold email or LinkedIn? Our SDR wants to fire up Apollo. Our investor says LinkedIn. We don't have budget for both."

I get this question on almost every strategy call.

Most answers you'll find are opinions. This one isn't. I ran cold email and LinkedIn DMs side by side for the same client, targeting the same ICP, with the same messaging, at the same time. One channel booked 22 sales calls. The other booked zero.

Here are the numbers, what happened, and the LinkedIn outreach strategy that produced the 22.

The setup: same client, same message, same window

The client is an AI startup with a narrow target market. I recommended LinkedIn DMs. They convinced me to layer cold email on top. Fine — let's find out. So I:

  1. Bought sending domains.
  2. Configured the inboxes and warmed them up.
  3. Built a prospect list in Apollo.
  4. Wrote a cold email sequence that mirrored my LinkedIn DM framework almost line for line.
  5. Launched both channels in tandem.

The message was the same. The offer was the same. The only variable was the channel.

Cold email results: 335 delivered, zero calls

Here's what cold email produced:

  • 390 contacts enrolled
  • 335 emails delivered
  • 63.6% open rate (with bots removed)
  • 3.3% click rate
  • 5.7% reply rate — every single one an automation or a negative response
  • 12.5% opt-out rate
  • 0 calls booked

Look at that open rate. 63.6% is a good open rate. People opened the emails. Then they did nothing, or they hit unsubscribe.

The replies we got:

  • "I am not interested but thanks for reaching out."
  • "We are well serviced and supplied. All the best!"
  • Out-of-office replies.
  • Business closure replies.
  • Recipient-has-passed-away replies.

When I say we got nothing from cold email, I mean we really got nothing. And a 12.5% opt-out rate is absolutely insane. One in eight people who received the email went out of their way to tell us never to email them again.

Laptop screen showing an overflowing email inbox

LinkedIn DM results: 139 DMs, 22 calls

Same client, same window, same messaging:

  • 800 connection requests sent
  • 139 prospects DM'd
  • 28 responses
  • 22 calls booked

That's a 20% reply rate and a 78.6% response-to-call rate. Of the people who replied, nearly 4 out of 5 booked a meeting.

The acceptance rate and reply rate were lower than my usual benchmarks because this client's market is so narrow that we had to send requests to people who aren't very active on LinkedIn. But that same narrow market is why the response-to-call rate was through the roof. When the right person replies, they're ready to talk. The full case study, with screenshots, is here.

Be honest: if someone gave you the choice between cold emailing 390 prospects for zero results or DMing 139 prospects and booking 22 calls, which would you choose?

Why cold email vs LinkedIn isn't close

The drawbridge effect

The first email in our cold sequence didn't sell anything. It was a soft, human opener. And we still got "I am not interested but thanks for reaching out."

These are involuntary responses. The moment someone even suspects it might be a cold email selling something, they pull up the drawbridge and tell you to go pound sand. People have been swimming in cold email for years, and AI made it worse. No one wants your cold email. They dread it.

Now compare that to the same exact messaging landing in a LinkedIn inbox from a real human with a real profile. The replies looked like this (paraphrased from the campaign):

  • "Thanks for connecting. Sure, why not compare notes."
  • "Happy to speak with you, perhaps next week."
  • "Yes, happy to connect for a chat. Send me a few times."
  • "Good to hear from you. Let's have a call. Any chance you have time tomorrow?"

Warm. Receptive. Same words, different channel.

The context is different

A cold email arrives from a stranger at a domain nobody's heard of. A LinkedIn DM arrives from someone who just connected, whose photo you've seen, whose profile you clicked through, whose last three posts are sitting in your feed. The trust work is done before the DM opens.

That's why I say content is a role player and DMs score. The profile and the posts don't book the call. They make the DM land.

The brand cost

When you run cold email at scale, you risk your brand's reputation. That 12.5% opt-out rate is 42 people who now associate the company's name with something they had to unsubscribe from. Multiply that across a year of sequences.

Nobody blocks you for a thoughtful LinkedIn DM. Worst case, they don't reply. And no reply doesn't always mean no.

The LinkedIn outreach strategy that booked 22 calls

Here's the formula:

  1. Choose LinkedIn DMs over cold email.
  2. Send 200 connection requests to your ICP every week.
  3. Send personalized, human DMs that pry at pain points.
  4. Send follow-ups loaded with value to non-respondents.
  5. Book call after call after call.

The hard part is No. 3. Here's how the DM works.

The 5-message LinkedIn DM sequence

Open the conversation a few days after someone accepts your request. Don't send one multi-paragraph message. Send a sequence of short DMs a few seconds apart — something no automation tool can replicate, and 4-5 unread messages get opened.

  1. The Greeting: "Hey [FIRST NAME]". That's it. AI prefers "Hi," so we go with "Hey."
  2. The Fist Bump: A soft compliment. You're a peer, not a vendor.
  3. The Educated Statement: Something only a true insider in their industry knows.
  4. The Pain-Point Question: One or two questions that pry at the problem you solve.
  5. The Personal Connection: Their city, their company, a shared experience. This goes last because it's the inbox preview. They see a human, not a pitch.

The cold email sequence used these same beats. The difference is that a LinkedIn inbox lets you deliver them the way a human actually talks.

Three groups to DM, and one to revive

  • New connections: the sequence above, a few days after they accept.
  • Profile viewers: they raised their hand. Reach out within 24 hours or they go cold. These convert at double the rate of cold connections.
  • Engagers: someone liked or commented on your post? Use the post as the opener. Warmer still.
  • Dead conversations: go back with value. A case study with real numbers. A lead magnet. An intro. I DM'd a Fortune 500 VP three times from a client's account with zero replies. Then her direct report booked a meeting days after the follow-up. She was reading every message.
Business owner smiling while reading a LinkedIn message on his phone

"But cold email scales"

I hear this one a lot. Yes, you can send 40,000 AI-written emails into the void. You'll get 40,000 chances to make a bad first impression and a handful of "not interested" replies for your trouble.

Scale isn't the goal. Sales calls are the goal. 139 hand-written DMs beat 335 delivered emails by 22 calls to zero. If you're worried about scale, here's how I send 200 requests and 100 DMs a week without any automation.

Take Action

Take Action: Pause your cold email sequence for two weeks. Take the exact messaging from it and rewrite it as the 5-message DM sequence above. Send it to 10 people who accepted a connection request from you this week. Compare the replies to your last 10 email replies. You'll have your answer before the two weeks are up.

FAQ

Is LinkedIn outreach better than cold email for B2B? In my side-by-side test for an AI startup, yes, and it wasn't close: 335 emails delivered booked zero calls, while 139 LinkedIn DMs booked 22. The DM lands in a context where the prospect can see your face, your profile, and your posts. The email lands next to 40 other cold emails.

What is a good reply rate for LinkedIn DMs? 25-35% for new connections when the profile is optimized and the content is consistent. Profile viewers and post engagers convert at roughly double that. Cold email in my test replied at 5.7%, and every reply was negative or automated.

Can I run cold email and LinkedIn together? You can, and that's exactly what this client asked for. The email channel added cost, a 12.5% opt-out rate, and zero calls. If you have the budget for both, put it toward more DMs and better sales assets instead.

Get the DM sequence with screenshots

I put the full DM playbook into the 7-Step LinkedIn DM Guide: the sequences for new connections, profile viewers, and engagers, the follow-ups that revive dead conversations, and the pitch-slap hall of shame so you know what not to send. Free.

Or skip the learning curve. I run DM campaigns from executive accounts for clients every week — no automation, no cold email, 3-4 qualified calls a week.

Let's look at your ICP and map the first 10 DMs together. 30 minutes.

Book a strategy call